Please enter your information below, to get our detailed SREL guide

    SECURE RTU ENFORCEMENT LAYER

    Securing Energy Distribution Networks Without RTU Replacement

    Today’s landscape of increasing OT-targeted attacks and strict regulations like IEC 62443, and NIS2 mandate, Remote Terminal Units (RTUs) represent a significant material enterprise risk. Traditional RTUs were designed for 10–20 year lifespans, prioritising reliability over cyber security. Here we outline a technically implementable cyber security architecture that establishes a robust security layer around existing field devices, eliminating the need for costly and operationally risky wholesale replacements.

    The Challenge: Legacy RTU Vulnerabilities

    RTUs form the “nervous system” of the energy grid, yet most operate with fundamental security gaps that cannot be addressed through simple patching

    • Protocol Weaknesses: Common protocols like Modbus, DNP3, and IEC 60870-5-101/104 often lack inherent security, authentication, or encryption.

    • Critical Security Gaps: Legacy hardware typically transmits traffic in clear text, lacks the ability to verify command sources, and has no protection against replay attacks.

    • Hardware Constraints: Limited CPU and RAM prevent the implementation of modern security controls like TLS or PKI directly on the devices.

    Proposed Solution is Connexite Secure RTU Enforcement Layer (SREL)

    The core principle of this architecture is to accept reality: RTUs are functionally reliable but cyber-insecure. The SREL acts as a mandatory, protocol-aware security gateway positioned between RTUs and SCADA systems.

    Key Operational Capabilities

    • Traffic Termination: SREL breaks the direct connection between field devices and control systems to establish a clear trust boundary.

    • Authentication & Validation: The architecture is able to validate the identity of all communication endpoints using modern authentication mechanisms moving security away from easily spoofed IP addresses.

    • Intelligent Command Filtering: The system distinguishes between “syntactically correct” and “operationally appropriate” traffic, blocking unauthorized or harmful commands.

    • Unidirectional Data Flows: For monitoring-only RTUs, the architecture can implement logical or physical data diodes, ensuring telemetry can leave the site while preventing any inbound commands from reaching sensitive infrastructure.

    Strategic and Investment Rationale

    Implementing an enforcement layer provides a superior business case compared to infrastructure replacement.

    Metric Impact of SREL Implementation
    RTU Replacement

    0 required; secures existing infrastructure as-is.
    Risk Reduction

    90% reduction in operational hazards by avoiding mass device swaps.
    Time to Compliance

    6–12 months to achieve regulatory alignment.
    Asset Life

    Protects historical CAPEX by extending the viable lifespan of existing RTUs.
    Implementation Roadmap

    Connexite recommends a phased approach to allow for continuous learning and minimal operational impact:

    Phase 1: Pilot Implementation: Deploy SREL at selected transformer centers to validate the architecture.

    Phase 2: Critical Asset Protection: Prioritize infrastructure deemed critical to grid stability.

    Phase 3: Graduated Rollout: Systematically expand across the estate based on established risk patterns.

    Phase 4: Full Estate Coverage: Achieve centralized monitoring and protection for all RTU communications.

    Compliance Mapping

    The SREL architecture provides a unified approach to meet multiple international and local standards simultaneously

    • IEC 62443: Achieves Security Levels 2 and 3 through enforced zones, conduits, and cryptographic integrity.

    • NIST / NERC CIP: Compatible with North American critical infrastructure protection frameworks.